Skip to content
UPEEC

Avalanche vs Zener Effect

A side-by-side comparison: what causes each breakdown, at what voltages, and why their temperature coefficients have opposite signs.

Advanced
Comments 0
Zener effectAvalanche effect
Physical causeQuantum tunnelling across a thin barrier (field emission)Impact ionisation and carrier multiplication
DopingHeavyLight to moderate
Depletion widthVery narrowWider
Typical breakdown voltageBelow about 5 VAbove about 7 V
Temperature coefficientNegative (VZV_Z falls as T rises)Positive (VBRV_{BR} rises as T rises)
Knee of the I–V curveSofterSharper
Dominant inLow-voltage Zener diodesHigher-voltage "Zener" diodes, rectifiers, APDs

Why the opposite temperature coefficients?

  • Zener: higher temperature → smaller band gap → tunnelling easier → lower breakdown voltage.
  • Avalanche: higher temperature → more lattice vibration (phonon scattering) → carriers lose energy in collisions more often → higher field needed → higher breakdown voltage.

A practical consequence: around 5–6 V the two effects roughly cancel, so diodes of about 5.6 V have nearly zero temperature coefficient. This is why ~5.6 V Zeners (or a Zener in series with a forward-biased diode) are popular as simple stable references.

Both breakdowns are reversible: the diode is only damaged if the power VZ⋅IZV_Z \cdot I_Z overheats it.

Spotted a mistake or want to add detail? Suggest an improvement — Content Contributors' edits are reviewed by editors before they go live.

Discussion (0)

Sign in or join free to ask questions and discuss this topic.